insights / picker
—— per-student insight

Krishna Subramanian

(you are counselor — submit will trigger a 403 demo)
CY-21108 · 17 yrs · Grade 12 · Mountain View Public School
confidence · HIGH live · claude-sonnet-4-6 · cached · 10614ms on the original call
RIASEC top 3: C I E
— riasec profile

Krishna Subramanian's Holland Code

Hand-rendered SVG · 6 dimensions, scored 0–100.

20 40 60 80 100 44 72 25 25 66 80 Realistic Investigative Artistic Social Enterprising Conventional

top 3 → CIE

— aptitude · DAT V

Student vs cohort mean

Krishna Subramanian · Cohort mean

—— ai narrative
live · claude-sonnet-4-6 · served from cache

Krishna Subramanian presents a distinctive aptitude profile anchored by exceptional verbal reasoning (95th percentile) and strong mechanical and abstract reasoning scores, complemented by solid speed-accuracy performance. Numeric reasoning is a relative gap area worth monitoring as career pathways are finalized. The RIASEC pattern — Conventional, Investigative, and Enterprising as the leading dimensions — points toward roles that blend analytical rigor with structured systems thinking and a degree of initiative.

The career match data places Quantitative Analyst, Software Engineer (CS), and Data Scientist (Research) as the top three fits, all within the 70–75 range. These roles align well with Krishna's Investigative and Conventional strengths. In a counselling session, Krishna surfaced the challenge of balancing creative interests with stable career paths, and the counsellor applied the three-test framework of interest, aptitude, and market demand to help bring clarity to this tension [2]. Research-oriented pathways appear to resonate particularly with Krishna's intrinsic curiosity [2].

On the assessment front, Krishna performed strongly in Maths (77/100) and English (75/100) on the mock CET battery, with time management noted as a strength. However, accuracy on the data interpretation section was identified as the key gap, and a targeted six-week practice sprint focusing on DI sets two evenings per week was recommended [1]. Closing this gap would directly strengthen competitiveness for quantitative and data-science programmes.

A follow-up mock interview with an industry mentor has already been pencilled in, which is an excellent step toward grounding Krishna's aspirations in real-world expectations [2]. Recommended next step: begin the six-week DI practice sprint immediately and use the mentor interview to stress-test fit with the Quantitative Analyst or Data Scientist track.

why this confidence level

live LLM inference grounded in 2 cited reports + RIASEC/aptitude data

—— top 5 matches

Career fit (ranked)

1
Quantitative Analyst
Finance · fit 75
2
Software Engineer (CS)
Engineering · fit 71
3
Data Scientist (research)
Research · fit 70
4
Pharmacist
Medicine · fit 66
5
Mechanical Engineer
Engineering · fit 65
Computed live · RIASEC overlap × demand index. Algorithm visible at /dashboard.
—— supervisor review · §3.4

Review status

queue →

No supervisor review yet. Submit this insight for review by an admin or reviewer before it's used in a counsellor-parent conversation.

—— citations

Source reports

Every [N] in the narrative above links to one of these reports. The summary cannot make claims that have no source.

[1]
Test result May 6, 2026 report #47
Mock CET / aptitude battery — Krishna Subramanian
[2]
Session note Feb 18, 2025 report #173
Career exploration session — Grade 12
Back to picker Search all reports for Krishna Subramanian