Harsh Kapoor
Harsh Kapoor's Holland Code
Hand-rendered SVG · 6 dimensions, scored 0–100.
top 3 → SEC
Student vs cohort mean
Harsh Kapoor · Cohort mean
Harsh Kapoor presents a distinctive aptitude profile marked by exceptional spatial reasoning (92nd percentile), speed and accuracy (93rd percentile), and strong abstract thinking (87th percentile). These strengths pair naturally with his dominant RIASEC profile of Social, Enterprising, and Conventional orientations, suggesting a student who is energized by leadership, structured environments, and working with people toward meaningful goals. Numeric aptitude (46th percentile) is the one area that warrants deliberate attention, particularly if finance-related pathways remain in the picture.
Career match scores place Investment Banking (75% fit) and Civil Services — IAS/IPS (74% fit) at the top, with Management Consulting close behind. Both leading options align well with Harsh's Enterprising and Social drives. His interest in civil services appears genuine and considered — during a career exploration session, Harsh himself surfaced the challenge of balancing creative interests with stable career paths, a real and worthwhile tension to sit with [2]. Applying the counsellor's "three-test" framework of interest, aptitude, and market demand to these options gives civil services a particularly strong overall case [2].
On the preparation side, Harsh's mock CET results showed impressive logical reasoning (90/100) and solid time management, but data interpretation accuracy emerged as a clear gap [1]. A targeted six-week sprint of DI practice, two evenings per week, is already recommended and should be prioritized before the next assessment cycle [1].
The most productive immediate move is to connect Harsh with alumni working in civil services or banking, so he can test both pathways against real lived experience rather than assumptions alone.
Recommended next step: Arrange introductions to at least two alumni — one in civil services and one in finance — within the next ten days, as planned at the close of the February session.
live LLM inference grounded in 2 cited reports + RIASEC/aptitude data
Career fit (ranked)
Review status
Source reports
Every [N] in the narrative above links to one of these reports. The summary cannot make claims that have no source.